Description of Project:
The Project titled `Watershed Management’ was implemented for 2 years – WM in short in the Shivapuri National Park is being implemented by the joint venture (JV) of the Centre for Green Economy Development, Nepal (CGED, Nepal) and the Integrated Development Society, Nepal (IDS-N). The supervising agency of the project is BRBIP and the implementing agency is IDS-Nepal and CGED-Nepal JV. Total allocated budget for the project was 22,645,736.75. The Project was a joint venture (JV) of the Centre for Green Economy Development, Nepal (CGED, Nepal) and Integrated Development Society, Nepal (IDS-N). The project was led by Dr. Madhav Karki and has five national professional experts and two community mobilization officers. The expected outcomes of the Project are: 1) Rehabilitated upper Bagmati sub-watersheds providing better livelihoods to basin community, 2) Awareness built on eco-friendly environment conservation leading to more effective buffer zone user groups and committees; and 3) Enhanced conservation based livelihoods opportunities for settlement community gains local ownership and sustainable management practices.
Highlights of the Project’s Achievement:
Achievements Highlights:
Overall: The watershed management project (NGO Package 1) has been concluded in a satisfactory, efficient and sustainable manner meeting the terms and conditions (TOR) laid out in the contract awarded to the IDS-Nepal-CGED-Nepal JV and BRBIP. The overall progress of the 3 year project is the successful achievement of the three major outcomes aimed by the project:
The TOR assigned to the NGO Package 1 included the following expectations: a) Support for declaration of the SNNP buffer zone and to prepare Buffer Zone Management plan; b) support the SNNP staff in preparing the Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park Management plans; c) Undertake awareness building, training and pilot demonstration of activities including organic farming and eco-tourism based livelihoods, community participated afforestation and reforestation through plantation of fuel/ fodder and fruit trees for stabilizing outward sloping agricultural land to reduce siltation; d) Promotion of more efficient cooking stoves; e) Improved sanitation and waste management to reduce pollution; and f) Motivate local people to be better environment stewards.
Gender Empowerment and Social Inclusion (GESI) or Gender Activity summary:
The watershed project activities were planned and implemented ensuring full and quality compliance of gender empowerment and social inclusion (GESI) standards and good practices. The front-line or boundary partners of the WM project were the 9 Buffer Zone User group (BZUG) one BZU Committee comprising of 63 elected members, one Buffer Zone Management Committee Chair and two Women’s Community Sanitation Campaign Group. In all our activities as explained above, women and indigenous members were the dominant population in all the groups formed and events organized and therefore the project has successfully met all the ADB prescribed norms and criteria in ensuring full gender inclusion, empowerment, access and active and meaningful participation in the Project as shown in our detail data in Annex VIII, Table 1 and 2.
Impact and Lessons Learned:
The major impact is the establishment of an excellent collaboration between the SNNP staff and BZUGs which is the foundation for improved upper Bagmati watershed management. Increased awareness among settlers and leadership of BZUGs and strengthened capacity of BGUC chair can help create a long term community based eco-friendly livelihood and income generating activities for the people. The BZUGs are in a position to implement the BZ management plan. The farmers are also exposed to participatory monitoring and joint planning, peer learning through farm visits, conducting joint workshops, training and exposure visits with Park staff. We also initiated tripartite dialogue among the SNNP, BRBIP and the HPCIBD that can continue in future to successfully complete and hand over the Dhap Dam.
Major Challenges Faced: The project faced numerous challenges. Uncertainty among the farmers due to GoN’s relocation plan was hindering motivation creation. Uncontrolled grazing by domestic animals, poor status of farmers, unsustainable exploitation of fuel wood, timber, fodder and food for subsistence livelihoods; Household Liquor making due to lack of alternate income sources, increasing invasive and weedy plant and species in the forest, poor transport communication and infrastructure, Lack of financial and infrastructure (office, roads, and fire tending equipment) with the SNNP to implement the management plans that have been prepared with the help of the watershed management project.
Conclusion and Way Forward: Although 3-year project duration is too short for watershed rehabilitation and management interventions to show impact, we have established a good foundation for future. We recommend to the BRBIP and SNNP not to break the momentum and continue with adaptive and innovative integrated watershed management activities we have initiated. There is a need to further develop collaboration and ownership of the WM project activities by the BZUGs/BZUC and the SNNP for which there is a need for a facilitator organization that can plan and organize joint events between SNNP and other components of the BRBIP. The BRBIP should continue supporting the SNNP through technical capacity building and knowledge management in areas such as improving the livelihoods of BZ communities focusing on organic farming, ecotourism and marketing of local products. In order to discourage tree felling all the poor (family with less than USD $ a day per capita income) with LPG gas cylinder and/or subsidized electrical cooking devices. The solar dryers programme should be expanded. There is also a need to reduce, recycle and reuse domestic, agriculture waste and ban single use plastic inside the park. Land and water pollution has to be eliminated through organic farming and awareness raising. The two women’s group should be further strengthened to maintain regular sanitation and cleaning of the solid waste. The SNNP should also improve wildlife habitat so that animals do not damage private properties and crops. Finally, park-people conflict which is minimal now can be further improved by promoting close collaborations among stakeholders. The project’s main exit strategy was to establish this culture in which we succeeded allowing us to exist in a harmonious manner.